When Apple (the company) decided to kick co-founder Steve Jobs out of the company due to conflict of ideals, the company came rolling down to mediocrity.
That’s why in 1997, the remnants of Apple got Mr. Jobs back which subsequently lead to the supremacy of Apple in the world of Information Technology.
In times of darkness, Steve Jobs, who is also called the modern day Leonardo Da Vinci, thought of ways and solutions be it on the marketing side of things or on innovating/inventing gadgets which are almost always a sure hit among the tech nerdos.
Steve Jobs, 56, just died of an illness he battled with for long years (which I know you Googled a while ago and found it was pancreatic cancer that caused the Apple CEO’s death).
And now that the latest version of iPhone (iPhone 4S) is still rumored to have some flaws, who will Apple lean its back on now that their think tank has succumbed to pancreatic cancer?
Could Apple still come up with products better than the iPods, iPads and iPhones?
Could they even equal the aforementioned gizmos’ appeal?
Articles say that the new admins of Apple are as good and are as innovative as the late visionary.
But with Steve Jobs’ death also came doubts and speculations about the withering or even the demise of the trillion dollars worth of company.
The death of Steve Jobs to Apple would be like Jaworski’s retirement to Barangay Ginebra, Revillame’s vacation Leave to Willing Willie and Vic Sotto’s non-presence on Eat Bulaga.
Apple would be less credible, definitely.
But would the company go down to the ashes? Only time could tell.
image from: imagedome.com